Structured Site Selection, End to End
An evaluation is the unit of work for site selection. Put your candidate sites into one evaluation, move them through Draft → In Analysis → Under Review → Approved, and never lose track of where each site stands.
Why Site Selection Loses Discipline
Without structure, every site selection cycle becomes its own ad-hoc project.
No common workflow
Every analyst evaluates sites their own way — comparisons become apples-to-oranges.
Status drift
Half the candidate sites are 'still being looked at' but nobody knows by whom.
Decisions vanish
When a site is rejected, the reasoning isn't captured anywhere durable.
What MyDealTeams Does
Evaluations bring the whole site-selection workflow into one structured artifact.
Multi-site evaluations
Group dozens of candidate sites under a single named evaluation.
Status workflow
Draft → In Analysis → Under Review → Approved / Rejected → Archived, enforced by the platform.
Site detail templates
Capture the same data on every candidate so comparisons stay clean.
Scoring, risks, pros & cons
All evaluation modules live inside the evaluation, never as standalone spreadsheets.
Map overview
See every candidate site on one map with trade areas and competitor data.
Approval routing
Send evaluations through approval chains with sign-off enforcement.
How Teams Use It
New-market expansion
Run a structured 8-site evaluation for a new metro entry.
Relocation analysis
Compare candidate sites against the incumbent location with the same criteria.
Acquisition pipelines
Triage acquisition targets through a repeatable evaluation flow.